jumpingjacktrash:

leepace:

characterizations of steve rogers i want:

image

characterizations of steve rogers i do not want:

image

you’re not liking the whole irish catholic immigrant thing, huh? that’s too bad. that’s a real shame. wanna change his mom’s name while you’re at it? maybe he can be from somewhere besides new york, that’d be fun. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

you can’t say thor’s fashion isn’t worth a bit of snark though. he’s wearing a theater curtain and six silver dollar pancakes. thor, buddy, babe, who dressed you.

Not OP, but I also don’t really like the second characterization, and not due to the religiousness but due to the… certainty? Idk, maybe this is my cultural instinct of religion being a private and personal matter (no idea how much of that he’d share), but asserting the existence of one god and one god only towards a stranger (which Natasha pretty much is at this point) who might not share this belief just seems out of character. (Given that this is the only scene in which religious beliefs even come up, and the fact that he seems much more … cautious? … in other interactions concerning people’s personal values and beliefs. Not afraid to tell them they’re wrong, because Steve, but not as a throwaway before he jumps out of a plane, but in an actual, interactive discussion in which he takes them seriously.)

And, like, I’ve read some good religious Steve fics, but I liked them because of his thoughtful and often conflicted approach to his religion, and that doesn’t fit this joke well either.

But the bright side is that natural processes beyond our control can still be understood and accounted for! E.g., studying earthquakes can help you figure out the warning signs (potentially helping people to get to safety), discover where they’re likely to occur, and develop less susceptible architecture. We cannot make the universe care for us, but we can adapt to it and care for each other.

szhmidty:

mitigatedchaos:

argumate:

Indeed, our only hope.

It is the bright side.  If there’s no God to help us, then there is also no God to stop us.

“no gods to help us, no gods to stop us” is legitimately inspirational.

Sweden Day 10 + 11

On Day 10, we go for a long walk in a forest very strange for Swedish standards: it has no blueberries. Instead, it has ferns and moss and grass like ordinary forests, and more deciduous trees than usual. It also has giant anthills almost every few steps, and we spend a lot of time watching the jumble of ants going about their days, running back and forth without apparent reason or grappling with objects much larger than them.

Continue reading “Sweden Day 10 + 11”

Sweden Day 8 + 9

Holiday spirit has set in for good, and the days start blurring together in a new routine: sleeping, eating, browsing, maybe walks or driving or grocery-shopping or multiple of the above, a movie, and then it’s back to sleeping. It’s neither terribly action-packed nor terribly boring. We rarely take two walks in the same place, but the blueberry forests are similar enough to each other that the descriptions would hardly differ unless they were very detailed, and if they were they’d probably just end up being a different kind of boring. The change from a gravel road to a dirt path covered in roots and needles is dramatic for one’s feet, and curious to one’s ears, but words about it on a page are not enough to entertain a hungry brain.

Continue reading “Sweden Day 8 + 9”

finnglas:

I’ve been contemplating for several days something, and I’ve been trying to distill it into meaning, and put nice little bullet points on how this relates to things that have been bugging me about some common Discourses I’ve been seeing, but at the end, I only really have a story. So here, have a story.

About ten years ago, sometime in the eventful 2006-2007 George W. Bush-ruled hellscape of my identity development, I was just starting to figure out how I felt about my conservative upbringing (not great) and whether I was some brand of queer (probably, but too scared to think about what brand for too long). I was working as a server at a popular Italian-inspired sit-down restaurant that was the closest thing my tiny South Carolinian town had to “fancy” at the time but isn’t really fancy at all.

The host brought a party of four men to one of my tables. It was hard to tell their ages, but my guess is they were teenagers or in their early 20s in the 1980s. Mid-40s, at the time. It was standard to ask if anyone at the table was celebrating anything, so I did. They said they were business partners celebrating a great business deal and would like a bottle of wine.

It was a fairly busy night so I didn’t have a LOT of time to spend at their table, but they were nice guys. They were polite and friendly to me, they didn’t hit on me (as most men were prone to do – sometimes even in front of their girlfriends, a story I’ll tell later if anyone wants me to), and they were racking up a hell of a tab that was going to make my managers happy, so I checked on them as often as I could.

Toward the end of their second bottle of wine, as they were finishing their entrees, I stopped at the table and asked if they wanted any more drinks or dessert or coffee. They were well and truly tipsy by now, giggling, leaning back in their chairs – but so, so careful not to touch each other when anyone was near the table.

They’re all on the fence about dessert, so being a good server, I offered to bring out the dessert menu so they could glance it over and make a decision, “Since you’re celebrating.”

“She’s right!” one of the men said, far too emphatically for a conversation on dessert. “It’s your anniversary! You should get dessert!”

It was like a movie. The whole table went absolutely silent. The clank of silverware at the next table sounded supernaturally loud. Dean Martin warbled “That’s Amore” in some distorted alternate universe where the rest of the restaurant went on acting like this one tipsy man hadn’t just shattered their carefully crafted cover story and blurted out in the middle of a tiny, South Carolina town, surrounded by conservatives and rednecks, that they were gay men celebrating a relationship milestone. 

And I didn’t know what I was yet, but I knew I wasn’t an asshole, and I knew these men were family, and I felt their panic like a monster breathing down all our necks. It’s impossible to emphasize how palpably terrified they were, and how justified their terror was, and how much I wanted them to be happy.

So I did the only thing I knew to do. I said, “Congratulations! How many years?”

The man who’d spoken up burst into tears. His partner stood up and wrapped me in the tightest, warmest hug I’ve ever had – and I’ve never liked being touched by strangers, but this was different, and I hugged him back.

“Thank you,” he whispered, halfway to crying himself. “Thank you so much.”

When he finally let go of me and sat back down, they finally got around to telling me they were, in fact, two couples on a double date, and both celebrating anniversaries. Fifteen years for one of them, I think, and a few years off for the other. It’s hard to remember. It was a jumble of tears and laughter and trembling relief for all of us. They got more relaxed. They started holding hands – under the table, out of sight of anyone but me, but happy.

They did get dessert, and I spent more time at their table, letting them tell me stories about how they met and how they started dating and their lives together, and feeling this odd sense of belonging, like I’d just discovered a missing branch of my family.

When they finally left, all four of them took turns standing up and hugging me, and all four of them reached into their wallets to tip me. I tried to wave them off but they insisted, and the first man who’d hugged me handed me forty dollars and said, “Please. You are an angel. Please take this.”

After they left I hid in the bathroom and cried because I couldn’t process all my thoughts and feelings.

Fast forward to three days ago, when my own partner and I showed up to a dinner reservation at a fancy-casual restaurant to celebrate our fifth anniversary. The whole time I was getting ready to leave, there was a worry in the back of my mind. The internet web form had asked if the reservation was celebrating anything in particular, and I’d selected “Anniversary.” I stood in the bathroom blow-drying my hair, wondering what I would do if we showed up, two women, and the host or the server took one look at us and the “Anniversary” designation on our reservation and refused to serve us. It’s not as ubiquitous anymore, but we’re still in the south, and these things still happen. Eight years of progressive leadership is over, and we’ve got another conservative despot in office who’s emboldening assholes everywhere.

It was on my mind the whole fifteen minutes it took to drive there. I didn’t mention it to my partner because I didn’t want to cast a shadow over the occasion. More than that, I didn’t want to jinx us, superstitious bastard that I am.

We walked into the restaurant. I told the hostess we had a reservation, gave her my last name.

She looked at her screen, then looked back at us. She smiled, broadly and genuinely, and said, “Happy anniversary! Your table is right this way.”

Our server greeted us, said, “I heard you were celebrating!”

“It’s our anniversary,” Kellie said, and our server gasped, beaming.

“That’s great! Congratulations! How many years?”

And I finally breathed a sigh of relief, and I thought about those men at that restaurant ten years ago. I hope they’re still safe and happy, and I hope we all get the satisfaction of helping the world keep blooming into something that’s not so unrelentingly terrible all the time.

Sweden Day 6

It’s finally warm enough to go swimming.

Or at least I think so during all the time I spend navigating bends and some oncoming traffic on the narrow dirt road to our destination: a fork formed by the coastline, three prongs of land reaching into the lake. We walk through another forest of conifers and birches and blueberries, our towels and swimming trunks in hand, until we reach the end of the first one.

Continue reading “Sweden Day 6”

Sweden Days 4 + 5

I start Day 4 late, only getting up around eleven after lounging around in bed for a while, and don’t get much more active for quite a while after that. It’s sunny and still too cold for swimming, and there doesn’t seem to be much to do – the forest is small enough to get boring quickly, and yesterday’s tick infestation has lessened its appeal further.

Continue reading “Sweden Days 4 + 5”

decameter:

kai-skai:

wirehead-wannabe:

ilzolende:

decameter:

Assume for the moment that kids seeing porn is a bad thing. What would be an actually good policy for having less of this sort of thing?

Presenting the industry as manipulative to its viewers and not just to its performers? Make sure that if something is someone’s only computer access, they can hide their screen from unconsenting third parties? (For this purpose installing monitoring software is fine, the goal is that if Alice wants to watch it Bob is not forced to see it, even though Alice is in the computer lab.) IDK.

I can’t think of one that wouldn’t involve restricting or compromising people’s privacy and/or their ability to access non-pornographic websites of their choosing.

Hmm, that depends on why/how kids actually see most of their porn, which I’m not sure about.

Most of my accidental porn exposure (underage and otherwise) came from online ads, and some of it was from stores that had actual hardcore porn DVDs and magazines out in the open (and in one case right beside the kids’ section, no kidding). If that’s the case for the majority of children, installing good adblockers everywhere and stricter/better regulation for stores would go a long way, and probably without causing much harm.

As for children intentionally seeking out porn, I think good sex ed could help, but answering the questions of how to actually have sex/how people actually do it (which seem pretty common and understandable) without resorting to any kind of pornographic material might be tough. Figuring out what exactly about it is harmful (if anything) and offering freely accessible materials without those components sounds like a better approach there – like wirehead-wannabe, I don’t think there’s a good way to restrict porn access for minors that would not also put undue restrictions on adults.

I am not down with the kids, but I am told smartphones are key.

I was thinking more about intentional/unintentional/half-intentional in that “my friends were all looking at it” way, but yeah, as for the device used, smartphones are probably on top of the list. Which would mean monitoring all their cell phone use to prevent them from looking, which would be a huge invasion of privacy.

wirehead-wannabe:

ilzolende:

decameter:

Assume for the moment that kids seeing porn is a bad thing. What would be an actually good policy for having less of this sort of thing?

Presenting the industry as manipulative to its viewers and not just to its performers? Make sure that if something is someone’s only computer access, they can hide their screen from unconsenting third parties? (For this purpose installing monitoring software is fine, the goal is that if Alice wants to watch it Bob is not forced to see it, even though Alice is in the computer lab.) IDK.

I can’t think of one that wouldn’t involve restricting or compromising people’s privacy and/or their ability to access non-pornographic websites of their choosing.

Hmm, that depends on why/how kids actually see most of their porn, which I’m not sure about.

Most of my accidental porn exposure (underage and otherwise) came from online ads, and some of it was from stores that had actual hardcore porn DVDs and magazines out in the open (and in one case right beside the kids’ section, no kidding). If that’s the case for the majority of children, installing good adblockers everywhere and stricter/better regulation for stores would go a long way, and probably without causing much harm.

As for children intentionally seeking out porn, I think good sex ed could help, but answering the questions of how to actually have sex/how people actually do it (which seem pretty common and understandable) without resorting to any kind of pornographic material might be tough. Figuring out what exactly about it is harmful (if anything) and offering freely accessible materials without those components sounds like a better approach there – like wirehead-wannabe, I don’t think there’s a good way to restrict porn access for minors that would not also put undue restrictions on adults.